From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Strahinja Kustudić <strahinjak@nordeus.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:05:34 -0400
Message-ID: <20121010160534.GD11892@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADKbJJUTr9ZWkbajR-7_6qaAsWH0=09=2AMo67C_Az-raKZE4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKbJJUTr9ZWkbajR-7_6qaAsWH0=09=2AMo67C_Az-raKZE4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:12:20AM +0200, Strahinja Kustudić wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a Postgresql 9.1 dedicated server with 16 cores, 96GB RAM and RAID10 15K
> SCSI drives which is runing Centos 6.2 x64. This server is mainly used for
> inserting/updating large amounts of data via copy/insert/update commands, and
> seldom for running select queries.
>
> Here are the relevant configuration parameters I changed:
>
> shared_buffers = 10GB
> effective_cache_size = 90GB
> work_mem = 32MB
> maintenance_work_mem = 512MB
> checkpoint_segments = 64
> checkpoint_completion_target = 0.8
>
> My biggest concern are shared_buffers and effective_cache_size, should I
> increase shared_buffers and decrease effective_cache_size? I read that values
> above 10GB for shared_buffers give lower performance, than smaller amounts?
>
> free is currently reporting (during the loading of data):
>
> $ free -m
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 96730 96418 311 0 71 93120
> -/+ buffers/cache: 3227 93502
> Swap: 21000 51 20949
>
> So it did a little swapping, but only minor, still I should probably decrease
> shared_buffers so there is no swapping at all.
You might want to read my blog entry about swap space:
http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2012.html#July_25_2012
It is probably swapping unused memory _out_ to make more use of RAM for
cache.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, strahinjak@nordeus.com
Subject: Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server
In-Reply-To: <20121010160534.GD11892@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox