pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>
To: Ghislain ROUVIGNAC <ghr@sylob.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Slow queries after vacuum analyze
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:09:54 -0500
Message-ID: <20121218200955.14720@gmx.com> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Ghislain ROUVIGNAC wrote:

> Memory : In use 4 Go, Free 15Go, cache 5 Go.

If the active portion of your database is actually small enough
that it fits in the OS cache, I recommend:

seq_page_cost = 0.1
random_page_cost = 0.1
cpu_tuple_cost = 0.05

> I plan to increase various parameters as follow:
> shared_buffers = 512MB
> temp_buffers = 16MB
> work_mem = 32MB
> wal_buffers = 16MB
> checkpoint_segments = 32
> effective_cache_size = 2560MB
> default_statistics_target = 500
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.05
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.025

You could probably go a little higher on work_mem and
effective_cache_size. I would leave default_statistics_target alone
unless you see a lot of estimates which are off by more than an
order of magnitude. Even then, it is often better to set a higher
value for a few individual columns than for everything. Remember
that this setting has no effect until you reload the configuration
and then VACUUM.

-Kevin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20121218200955.14720@gmx.com>
Permalink:  ../20121218200955.14720@gmx.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20121218200955.14720@gmx.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: kgrittn@mail.com, ghr@sylob.com
  Subject: Re: Slow queries after vacuum analyze
  In-Reply-To: <20121218200955.14720@gmx.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox