pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:45:41 -0400
Message-ID: <20130910014541.GB32160@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1FB7FBAE29E634FA58D6CC0D59F288B3412B4BB@CH1PRD0511MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <E1FB7FBAE29E634FA58D6CC0D59F288B3412B4BB@CH1PRD0511MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:36:27AM +0000, Mel Llaguno wrote:
> Let me clarify further - when we reconstruct our schema (without the
> upgrade step) via a sql script, the problem still persists. Restoring
> an upgraded DB which contains existing data into exactly the same
> instance will correct the behavior.

I do not understand what you are saying above.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (43+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20130910014541.GB32160@momjian.us>
Permalink:  ../20130910014541.GB32160@momjian.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20130910014541.GB32160@momjian.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: bruce@momjian.us, mllaguno@coverity.com, andrew@dunslane.net, jeff.janes@gmail.com, josh@agliodbs.com, amit.kapila@huawei.com
  Subject: Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  In-Reply-To: <20130910014541.GB32160@momjian.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox