From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:04:35 -0500
Message-ID: <20140211190435.GH2289@momjian.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25945.1392144888@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20140201032207.GD31141@momjian.us>
<CA+TgmoYOAzNKWKdkNcq50MFQKdgSt1ESR6zxb8XKCiNO6YBX2A@mail.gmail.com>
<20140211155607.GB2289@momjian.us>
<CA+TgmobeczQK0LhgVz_bSs7M4iTbCP=sfK8=6yDuCpwtOiuCCw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140211171213.GE2289@momjian.us>
<20140211175410.GF31598@awork2.anarazel.de>
<20140211182319.GF2289@momjian.us>
<20140211183103.GJ15246@awork2.anarazel.de>
<20140211184146.GG2289@momjian.us>
<25945.1392144888@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:54:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:31:03PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> I am not saying it shouldn't be improved, I just don't see the point of
> >> bringing it up while everyone is busy with the last CF and claiming it
> >> is unusable and that stating that it is surprisising that nobody really
> >> cares.
>
> > Well, I brought it up in September too. My point was not that it is a
> > new issue but that it has been such an ignored issue for two years. I
> > am not asking for a fix, but right now we don't even have a plan on how
> > to improve this.
>
> Indeed, and considering that we're all busy with the CF, I think it's
> quite unreasonable of you to expect that we'll drop everything else
> to think about this problem right now. The reason it's like it is
> is that it's not easy to see how to make it better; so even if we did
> drop everything else, it's not clear to me that any plan would emerge
> anytime soon.
Well, documenting the VACUUM requirement and adding it to the TODO list
are things we should consider for 9.4. If you think doing that after
the commit-fest is best, I can do that.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: bruce@momjian.us, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@2ndquadrant.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, jim@nasby.net, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, peter@2ndquadrant.com, andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] encouraging index-only scans
In-Reply-To: <20140211190435.GH2289@momjian.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox