From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: checkpoints, proper config
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:45:41 -0300
Message-ID: <20151210224541.GQ2763@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5669FF52.2030303@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <CAEaSS0af0GpqQYSwePKRQq6RtX-x9NXDm=jOXcbcGAmGHXapFw@mail.gmail.com>
<5669B47B.9010504@commandprompt.com>
<5669FF52.2030303@2ndquadrant.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Also, I don't think it makes much sense to set
>
> (checkpoint_warning > checkpoint_timeout)
>
> as it kinda defeats the whole purpose of the warning.
I agree, but actually, what is the sense of checkpoint_warning? I think
it was useful back when we didn't have log_checkpoints, but now that we
have detailed checkpoint logging I think it's pretty much useless noise.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: checkpoints, proper config
In-Reply-To: <20151210224541.GQ2763@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox