pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: julyanto SUTANDANG <julyanto@equnix.co.id>
Cc: Dinesh Chandra 12108 <Dinesh.Chandra@cyient.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Backup taking long time !!!
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:23:01 -0500
Message-ID: <20170123172301.GH18360@tamriel.snowman.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMkU=1x929ghAR9orvySuxhTGBZmwKABSjy36G=OCBOPsj4_kQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0fb0c8c3f69340a3a7d70b1c39fa2b2c@cyient.com>
	<CAGu3fER+B6dFk=7F+DEMPPOSerYZs0HZMOfVAkbKs5Gdi-B-mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGu3fERNACLx23C9uARdCb98TJWY_Nd+bMGsBsmo6A8vy01p+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170122145740.GE18360@tamriel.snowman.net>
	<CAMkU=1x929ghAR9orvySuxhTGBZmwKABSjy36G=OCBOPsj4_kQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

* Jeff Janes (jeff.janes@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Just to make sure anyone reading the mailing list archives isn't
> > confused, running pg_start_backup does *not* make PG stop writing to
> > BASEDIR (or DATADIR, or anything, really).  PG *will* continue to write
> > data into BASEDIR after pg_start_backup has been called.
> 
> Correct.  Unfortunately it is a very common myth that it does cause
> PostgreSQL to stop writing to the base dir.

I would love a way to dispel that myth. :/

If you have any suggestions of how we could improve the docs, I'd
certainly be happy to take a look and try to help.

> > The only thing that pg_start_backup does is identify an entry in the WAL
> > stream, from which point all WAL must be replayed when restoring the
> > backup.  All WAL generated from that point (pg_start_backup point) until
> > the pg_stop_backup point *must* be replayed when restoring the backup or
> > the database will not be consistent.
> 
> pg_start_backup also forces full_page_writes to be effectively 'on' for the
> duration of the backup, if it is not already explicitly on (which it
> usually will already be).  This affects pg_xlog, of course, not base.  But
> it is an essential step for people who run with full_page_writes=off, as it
> ensures that anything in base which got changed mid-copy will be fixed up
> during replay of the WAL.

Agreed.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachments:

  signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 818B) download

view thread (42+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20170123172301.GH18360@tamriel.snowman.net>
Permalink:  ../20170123172301.GH18360@tamriel.snowman.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20170123172301.GH18360@tamriel.snowman.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, jeff.janes@gmail.com, julyanto@equnix.co.id, Dinesh.Chandra@cyient.com
  Subject: Re: Backup taking long time !!!
  In-Reply-To: <20170123172301.GH18360@tamriel.snowman.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox