pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Patrick Hemmer <postgresql@stormcloud9.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Adrien Nayrat <adrien.nayrat@anayrat.info>
Subject: Re: performance statistics monitoring without spamming logs
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:41:15 -0600
Message-ID: <20181122054115.GI10913@telsasoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180710183828.GB3890@telsasoft.com>
References: <7ffb9dbe-c76f-8ca3-12ee-7914ede872e6@stormcloud9.net>
	<20180710183828.GB3890@telsasoft.com>

Hi,

I'm replying to an old thread from -performance:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7ffb9dbe-c76f-8ca3-12ee-7914ede872e6%40stormcloud9.net

I was looking at:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/20/1691/
"New GUC to sample log queries"

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:54:12PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> I'm looking for a way of gathering performance stats in a more usable
> way than turning on `log_statement_stats` (or other related modules).
> The problem I have with the log_*_stats family of modules is that they
> log every single query, which makes them unusable in production. Aside
> from consuming space, there's also the problem that the log system
> wouldn't be able to keep up with the rate.
> 
> There are a couple ideas that pop into mind that would make these stats
> more usable:
> 1. Only log when the statement would otherwise already be logged. Such
> as due to the `log_statement` or `log_min_duration_statement` settings.

..but instead came back to this parallel thread and concluded that I'm
interested in exactly that behavior: log_statement_stats only if
log_min_duration_statement exceeded.

If there's agreement that's desirable behavior, should I change
log_statement_stats to a GUC (on/off/logged) ?

Or, would it be reasonable to instead change the existing behavior of
log_statement_stats=on to mean what I want: only log statement stats if
statement is otherwise logged.  If log_statement_stats is considered to be a
developer option, most likely to be enabled either in a development or other
segregated or non-production environment, or possibly for only a single session
for diagnostics.

My own use case is that I'd like to know if a longrunning query was doing lots
of analytics (aggregation/sorting), or possibly spinning away on a nested
nested loop.  But I only care about the longest queries, and then probably look
at the ratio of user CPU/clock time.

Justin




view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20181122054115.GI10913@telsasoft.com>
Permalink:  ../20181122054115.GI10913@telsasoft.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20181122054115.GI10913@telsasoft.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: pryzby@telsasoft.com, postgresql@stormcloud9.net, adrien.nayrat@anayrat.info
  Subject: Re: performance statistics monitoring without spamming logs
  In-Reply-To: <20181122054115.GI10913@telsasoft.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox