From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mariel Cherkassky <mariel.cherkassky@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ERROR: unrecognized parameter "autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor"
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:39:55 -0300
Message-ID: <20190215133955.GA12954@alvherre.pgsql> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+t6e1m7g309O=P6p4jSkxZUa45MGEc_A3+fvuF69Mv-cvK8cw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2019-Feb-14, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
> I meant the anaylze, if anaylze will run very often on the original table,
> arent there disadvantages for it ?
It'll waste time and resources pointlessly. Don't do it -- it won't do
any good.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, mariel.cherkassky@gmail.com, pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ERROR: unrecognized parameter "autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor"
In-Reply-To: <20190215133955.GA12954@alvherre.pgsql>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox