From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12.3 slow index scan chosen
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:29:06 -0500
Message-ID: <20200622192906.GD1497@aart.rice.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622192732.GA29072@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <1815407.1592677323@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200622192732.GA29072@alvherre.pgsql>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:27:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Jun-20, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I wrote:
> > > ... oh, now I see: apparently, your filter condition is such that *no*
> > > rows of the objectcustomfieldvalues table get past the filter:
> > >
> > > -> Index Scan using objectcustomfieldvalues3 on objectcustomfieldvalues objectcustomfieldvalues_1 (cost=0.56..807603.40 rows=915 width=4) (actual time=21165.441..21165.441 rows=0 loops=1)
> > > Filter: ((disabled = 0) AND ((largecontent ~~* '%958575%'::text) OR ((content)::text ~~* '%958575%'::text)))
> > > Rows Removed by Filter: 19030904
>
> > You said you'd increased the stats target for
> > objectcustomfieldvalues.objectid, but maybe the real problem is needing
> > to increase the targets for content and largecontent, in hopes of driving
> > down the estimate for how many rows will pass this filter condition.
>
> ... but those on content and largecontent are unanchored conditions --
> are we still able to do any cardinality analysis using those? I thought
> not. Maybe a trigram search would help? See contrib/pg_trgm -- as far
> as I remember that module is able to work with LIKE conditions.
>
Hi Alvaro,
I do have a pg_trgm GIN index on those fields for the search.
Regards,
Ken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: ktm@rice.edu, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12.3 slow index scan chosen
In-Reply-To: <20200622192906.GD1497@aart.rice.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox