pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Cc: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@dunaweb.hu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] psql -A (unaligned format) eats too much memory
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:27:30 -0400
Message-ID: <20512.1149521250@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060605152258.GT53487@pervasive.com>
References: <44835834.2020309@dunaweb.hu>
	<44835F86.5040008@dunaweb.hu>
	<20060605152258.GT53487@pervasive.com>

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> I've been able to verify this on 8.1.4; psql -A -t -c 'SELECT * FROM
> largetable' > /dev/null results in psql consuming vast quantities of
> memory. Why is this?

Is it different without the -A?

I'm reading this as just another uninformed complaint about libpq's
habit of buffering the whole query result.  It's possible that there's
a memory leak in the -A path specifically, but nothing said so far
provided any evidence for that.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <20512.1149521250@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../20512.1149521250@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/20512.1149521250@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jnasby@pervasive.com, zboszor@dunaweb.hu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: [PERFORM] psql -A (unaligned format) eats too much memory
  In-Reply-To: <20512.1149521250@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox