From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Steven Rosenstein <srosenst@us.ibm.com>
Cc: pgsql-perform <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re:
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:12:21 -0400
Message-ID: <21154.1115136741@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF93C70832.2AC188CE-ON85256FF6.0056B587-85256FF6.005774C2@us.ibm.com>
References: <OF93C70832.2AC188CE-ON85256FF6.0056B587-85256FF6.005774C2@us.ibm.com>
Steven Rosenstein <srosenst@us.ibm.com> writes:
> My question is, are there any advantages, drawbacks, or outright
> restrictions to using multiple simultaneous COPY commands to load data into
> the same table?
It will work; not sure about whether there is any performance benefit.
I vaguely recall someone having posted about doing this, so you might
check the archives.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, srosenst@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re:
In-Reply-To: <21154.1115136741@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox