pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:08:24 -0400
Message-ID: <21400.1239980904@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E89B29.10705@ejurka.com>
References: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0904161836540.11937@leary.csoft.net>
	<7163.1239923531@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0904161921080.11937@leary.csoft.net>
	<Pine.BSO.4.64.0904162046050.27034@leary.csoft.net>
	<21238.1239980554@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<49E89B29.10705@ejurka.com>

Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes:
> The hash join takes less than twenty seconds, the other two joins I 
> killed after five minutes.  I can try to collect explain analyze results 
> later today if you'd like.

Please, unless the test case you already posted has similar behavior.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <21400.1239980904@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../21400.1239980904@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/21400.1239980904@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, books@ejurka.com
  Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
  In-Reply-To: <21400.1239980904@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox