pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tim Jones <TJones@optio.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: strange query behavior
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:48:35 -0500
Message-ID: <22464.1166118515@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D39F7B01@mail.optiosoftware.com>
References: <47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D39F79A5@mail.optiosoftware.com>
	<10648.1166037392@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D39F79FA@mail.optiosoftware.com>
	<12988.1166052295@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<47668A1334CDBF46927C1A0DFEB223D39F7B01@mail.optiosoftware.com>

"Tim Jones" <TJones@optio.com> writes:
> 18,273,008 rows in observationresults
> [ and n_distinct = 12942 ]

OK, so the estimated rowcounts are coming from those two numbers.
It's notoriously hard to get a decent n_distinct estimate from a small
sample :-(, and I would imagine the number of batteryidentifiers is
really a lot more than 12942?

What you need to do is increase the statistics target for
observationresults.batteryidentifier (see ALTER TABLE) and re-ANALYZE
and see if you get a saner n_distinct in pg_stats.  I'd try 100 and
then 1000 as target.  Or you could just increase the global default
target (see postgresql.conf) but that might be overkill.

It's still a bit odd that the case with two batteryidentifiers was
estimated fairly accurately when the other wasn't; I'll go look into
that.  But in any case you need better stats if you want good plans.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <22464.1166118515@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../22464.1166118515@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/22464.1166118515@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, TJones@optio.com
  Subject: Re: strange query behavior
  In-Reply-To: <22464.1166118515@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox