pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgdba <postgresql@inbox.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Incorrect row estimates in plan?
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:38:09 -0400
Message-ID: <22791.1190824689@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12903194.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <12902068.post@talk.nabble.com>
	<20944.1190817914@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<12903194.post@talk.nabble.com>

pgdba <postgresql@inbox.com> writes:
> Tom Lane-2 wrote:
> ->  Bitmap Index Scan on slog_gri_idx 
> (cost=0.00..82.26
> rows=2870 width=0) (actual time=41.306..41.306 rows=83538 loops=1)
> Index Cond: ((gid = 10000) AND (rule = ANY
> ('{1,2,8,9,10}'::integer[])) AND (CASE WHEN (rule = ANY
> ('{8,9}'::integer[])) THEN destip ELSE srcip END =
> '192.168.10.23'::inet))
>> 
>> [ blink... ]  Pray tell, what is the definition of this index?

> Original index: "create index slog_gri_idx on slog (gid,rule,(case when rule
> in (8,9) then
> destip else srcip end)) WHERE (rule in (1, 2, 8, 9, 10))"

> The purpose of that index is to match a specific query (one that gets run
> frequently and needs to be fast).

Ah.  I didn't think you would've put such a specific thing into an index
definition, but if you're stuck supporting such badly written queries,
maybe there's no other way.

I rather doubt that you're going to be able to make this query any
faster than it is, short of buying enough RAM to keep the whole table
RAM-resident.  Pulling 80000 random rows in 1200 msec doesn't sound
all that slow to me.

The ultimate solution might be to rethink your table designs ...

			regards, tom lane



view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <22791.1190824689@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../22791.1190824689@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/22791.1190824689@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, postgresql@inbox.com
  Subject: Re: Incorrect row estimates in plan?
  In-Reply-To: <22791.1190824689@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox