From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Slow queries salad ;)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:20:29 -0400
Message-ID: <22918.1145989229@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.s8kry1nucigqcu@apollo13>
References: <op.s8kry1nucigqcu@apollo13>
PFC <lists@peufeu.com> writes:
> The IN() is quite small (150 values), but the two large tables are
> seq-scanned... is there a way to avoid this ?
Not in 8.1. HEAD is a bit smarter about joins to Append relations.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, lists@peufeu.com
Subject: Re: Slow queries salad ;)
In-Reply-To: <22918.1145989229@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox