From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: David Lang <dlang@invendra.net>
Cc: Steve Oualline <soualline@stbernard.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Database restore speed
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:32:20 -0500
Message-ID: <2404.1133641940@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BFB7350A.14FC7%llonergan@greenplum.com>
References: <BFB7350A.14FC7%llonergan@greenplum.com>
"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes:
> Last I looked at the Postgres binary dump format, it was not portable or
> efficient enough to suit the need. The efficiency problem with it was that
> there was descriptive information attached to each individual data item, as
> compared to the approach where that information is specified once for the
> data group as a template for input.
Are you complaining about the length words? Get real...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, llonergan@greenplum.com, sfrost@snowman.net, dlang@invendra.net, soualline@stbernard.com
Subject: Re: Database restore speed
In-Reply-To: <2404.1133641940@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox