From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
Cc: Pgsql-Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance PG 8.0 on dual opteron / 4GB / 3ware
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:26:13 -0500
Message-ID: <2503.1131308773@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1131305633.5882.17.camel@Panoramix>
References: <1131283854.15471.4.camel@Panoramix>
<25425.1131297440@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1131305633.5882.17.camel@Panoramix>
Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl> writes:
> Explain analyse (with PgAdmin):
> ...
> Total runtime: 5049.467 ms
> Actual execution time: 82163 MS (without getting the data)
I'm confused --- where's the 82sec figure coming from, exactly?
We've heard reports of performance issues in PgAdmin with large
result sets ... if you do the same query in psql, what happens?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl
Subject: Re: Performance PG 8.0 on dual opteron / 4GB / 3ware
In-Reply-To: <2503.1131308773@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox