From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL <martin@portant.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 8.1 iss
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:31:18 -0500
Message-ID: <25136.1131294678@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dkko49$1v06$1@news.hub.org>
References: <dkko49$1v06$1@news.hub.org>
"PostgreSQL" <martin@portant.com> writes:
> This is a pretty good example of the place where 8.1 seems to be quite
> broken.
That's a bit of a large claim on the basis of one data point.
Did you remember to re-ANALYZE after loading the table into the
new database?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, martin@portant.com
Subject: Re: 8.1 iss
In-Reply-To: <25136.1131294678@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox