From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:55:56 -0400
Message-ID: <25149.1206683756@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803280151.54874.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
References: <20080317021856.0D2D37558DC@cvs.postgresql.org>
<200803271656.45574.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
<2092.1206652297@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200803280151.54874.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>> If you can convince me it's a regression I might reconsider, but I
>> rather doubt that 8.2 was better,
> Well, I can't speak for 8.2, but I have a second system crunching the same
> data using the same function on 8.1 (on lesser hardware in fact), and it
> doesn't have these type of issues.
If you can condense it to a test case that is worse on 8.3 than 8.1,
I'm willing to listen...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, xzilla@users.sourceforge.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search
In-Reply-To: <25149.1206683756@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox