From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <LLonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Restore performance?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:24:29 -0400
Message-ID: <26129.1144682669@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53852.195.41.66.226.1144658699.squirrel@mail.jabbernet.dk>
References: <e1d31l$2nt$1@sea.gmane.org>
<3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D01F475D5@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com>
<53852.195.41.66.226.1144658699.squirrel@mail.jabbernet.dk>
"Jesper Krogh" <jesper@krogh.cc> writes:
> gzip does not seem to be the bottleneck, on restore is psql the nr. 1
> consumer on cpu-time.
Hm. We've seen some situations where readline mistakenly decides that
the input is interactive and wastes lots of cycles doing useless
processing (like keeping history). Try "psql -n" and see if that helps.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, jesper@krogh.cc, LLonergan@greenplum.com
Subject: Re: Restore performance?
In-Reply-To: <26129.1144682669@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox