pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
To: david_list@boreham.org
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:43:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <26758313.1146001394944.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net> (raw)

I've had intermittent "freeze and reboot" and, worse, just plain freeze problems with the Core Duo's I've been testing.  I have not been able to narrow it down so I do not know if it is a platform issue or a CPU issue.  It appears to be HW, not SW, related since I have experienced the problem both under M$ and Linux 2.6 based OS's.  I have not tested the Core Duo's under *BSD.

Also, being that they are only 32b Core Duo's have limited utility for a present day DB server.

Power and space critical applications where 64b is not required may be a reasonable place for them... ...if the   
present reliability problems I'm seeing go away.

Ron


-----Original Message-----
>From: David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
>Sent: Apr 25, 2006 5:15 PM
>To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
>Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
>
>
>>My personal favorite pg platform at this time is one based on a 2 socket, dual core ready mainboard with 16 DIMM slots combined with dual core AMD Kx's.
>>  
>>
>Right. We've been buying Tyan bare-bones boxes like this.
>It's better to go with bare-bones than building boxes from bare metal
>because the cooling issues are addressed correctly.
>
>Note that if you need a large number of machines, then Intel
>Core Duo may give the best overall price/performance because
>they're cheaper to run and cool.
>



view thread (40+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <26758313.1146001394944.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Permalink:  ../26758313.1146001394944.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/26758313.1146001394944.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: rjpeace@earthlink.net, david_list@boreham.org
  Subject: Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
  In-Reply-To: <26758313.1146001394944.JavaMail.root@elwamui-mouette.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox