pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Christian Storm <christian.storm@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Subject: Re: pgmemcache
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:38:00 -0400
Message-ID: <26792.1144949880@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D23826E-7325-4946-B79A-80E321E0E497@gmail.com>
References: <1144135482.063425.33380@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
	<20060411225515.GZ49405@pervasive.com>
	<op.s7vvyggtcigqcu@apollo13>
	<200604121603.43986.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<20060413001024.GP49405@pervasive.com>
	<6236.1144888514@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4D23826E-7325-4946-B79A-80E321E0E497@gmail.com>

Christian Storm <christian.storm@gmail.com> writes:
> Not sure if I follow why this is a problem.  Seems like it would be  
> beneficial to have both BEFORE and AFTER COMMIT triggers.
> With the BEFORE COMMIT trigger you would have the ability to 'un- 
> commit' (rollback) the transaction.  With
> the AFTER COMMIT trigger you wouldn't have that option because the  
> commit has already been successful.  However,
> with an AFTER COMMIT you would be able to trigger other downstream  
> events that rely on a transaction successfully committing.

An AFTER COMMIT trigger would have to be in a separate transaction.
What happens if there's more than one, and one of them fails?  Even
more to the point, if it's a separate transaction, don't you have
to fire all these triggers again when you commit that transaction?
The idea seems circular.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (14+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <26792.1144949880@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../26792.1144949880@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/26792.1144949880@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, christian.storm@gmail.com, jnasby@pervasive.com, josh@agliodbs.com, lists@peufeu.com
  Subject: Re: pgmemcache
  In-Reply-To: <26792.1144949880@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox