From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Constantine Filin <cfilin@intermedia.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq vs. unixODBC performance
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:40:39 -0500
Message-ID: <2704.1137890439@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FD6AFE16B92B544E809E0EAC9C8B7850B664D3@ex1.intermedia-inc.net>
References: <FD6AFE16B92B544E809E0EAC9C8B7850B664D3@ex1.intermedia-inc.net>
"Constantine Filin" <cfilin@intermedia.net> writes:
> Do you have any ideas why libpq is so much slower than unixODBC?
Perhaps ODBC is batching the queries into a transaction behind your
back? Or preparing them for you?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, cfilin@intermedia.net
Subject: Re: libpq vs. unixODBC performance
In-Reply-To: <2704.1137890439@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox