From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:27:33 -0400
Message-ID: <27745.1150381653@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6qtjn$22ui$1@news.hub.org>
References: <200601021840.k02Ieed21704@candle.pha.pa.us>
<200606150405.k5F45cH11445@candle.pha.pa.us>
<e6qtjn$22ui$1@news.hub.org>
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> Obviously it matches your expectation.
Hm? I don't see any improvement there:
> --Before patch --
> real 0m1.149s
> real 0m1.121s
> real 0m1.128s
> -- After patch --
> real 0m1.275s
> real 0m4.063s
> real 0m1.259s
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
In-Reply-To: <27745.1150381653@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox