From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kim <kim@myemma.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:20:52 -0500
Message-ID: <27939.1168539652@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45A671CD.1050706@myemma.com>
References: <45A671CD.1050706@myemma.com>
Kim <kim@myemma.com> writes:
> size of pg_class: 535,226
> number of relations: 108,694
Oh, I shoulda read all the way to the bottom of your email :-(. What
version of PG were you running before? I would think that pretty much
any version of pgstat_vacuum_tabstats would have had a performance issue
with pg_class that large. Also, could we see
select relkind, count(*) from pg_class group by relkind;
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kim@myemma.com
Subject: Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade
In-Reply-To: <27939.1168539652@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox