pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:00:15 -0400
Message-ID: <28551.1175839215@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704051312410.26199@asgard.lang.hm>
References: <HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHMEMGHGAA.james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
	<19221.1175751146@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1175786370.9839.31.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<E1HZUmO-0007bS-62@elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0704051312410.26199@asgard.lang.hm>

david@lang.hm writes:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Ron wrote:
>> Yep.  Folks should google "bath tub curve of statistical failure" or similar. 
>> Basically, always burn in your drives for at least 1/2 a day before using 
>> them in a production or mission critical role.

> for this and your first point, please go and look at the google and cmu 
> studies. unless the vendors did the burn-in before delivering the drives 
> to the sites that installed them, there was no 'infant mortality' spike on 
> the drives (both studies commented on this, they expected to find one)

It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
fraction of infant mortality.  The savings in return processing and
customer goodwill would surely justify the electricity they'd use.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (91+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <28551.1175839215@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../28551.1175839215@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/28551.1175839215@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david@lang.hm, rjpeace@earthlink.net, smarlowe@g2switchworks.com
  Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
  In-Reply-To: <28551.1175839215@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox