From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: K C Lau <kclau60@netvigator.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: SELECT LIMIT 1 VIEW Performance Issue
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:41:14 -0400
Message-ID: <29336.1127403674@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050922221846.02c45fb8@localhost>
References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050615100524.04f9d6a8@localhost>
<6.2.1.2.0.20050922102035.07bcf2e0@localhost>
<1127378456.4145.76.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<6.2.1.2.0.20050922181009.02c36ca8@localhost>
<1127393284.4145.109.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<6.2.1.2.0.20050922221846.02c45fb8@localhost>
K C Lau <kclau60@netvigator.com> writes:
> At 20:48 05/09/22, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Even if this were fixed for 8.1, which seems unlikely, would you be able
>> to move to that release immediately?
> Yes. In fact when we first developed our system a few years ago, we tested
> on MS7.0, Oracle 8 and PG 7.1.1 and we did not hit that problem.
It's really not credible that PG 7.1 did any better with this than
current sources do. The subplan mechanism hasn't changed materially
since about 6.5. It could be that 7.1's performance was simply so
bad across the board that you didn't notice ...
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, kclau60@netvigator.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: SELECT LIMIT 1 VIEW Performance Issue
In-Reply-To: <29336.1127403674@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox