From: Chris Ruprecht <chris@cdrbill.com>
To: Evgeny Shishkin <itparanoia@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Have: Seq Scan - Want: Index Scan - what am I doing wrong?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:19:43 -0400
Message-ID: <2A64CF51-CC89-4A0A-89CC-49D7ABFD4603@cdrbill.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BB26B73-2824-4C97-92B5-5E059108C071@gmail.com>
References: <91417DD6-C9FF-40EA-8EA9-87DF7E696927@cdrbill.com>
<9BB26B73-2824-4C97-92B5-5E059108C071@gmail.com>
On Oct 16, 2012, at 20:01 , Evgeny Shishkin <itparanoia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Selecting 5 yours of data is not selective at all, so postgres decides it is cheaper to do seqscan.
>
> Do you have an index on patient.dnsortpersonnumber? Can you post a result from
> select count(*) from patient where dnsortpersonnumber = '347450'; ?
>
Yes, there is an index:
"Aggregate (cost=6427.06..6427.07 rows=1 width=0)"
" -> Index Scan using patient_pracsortpatientnumber on patient (cost=0.00..6427.06 rows=1 width=0)"
" Index Cond: (dnsortpersonnumber = '347450'::text)"
In fact, all the other criteria is picked using an index. I fear that the >= and <= on the timestamp is causing the issue. If I do a "=" of just one of them, I get an index scan. But I need to scan the entire range. I get queries like "give me everything that was entered into the system for this patient between these two dates". A single date wouldn't work.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: chris@cdrbill.com, itparanoia@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Have: Seq Scan - Want: Index Scan - what am I doing wrong?
In-Reply-To: <2A64CF51-CC89-4A0A-89CC-49D7ABFD4603@cdrbill.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox