From: Clailson <clailson.dba@gmail.com>
To: phillip@couto.in
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Optimization inner join
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:04:28 -0300
Message-ID: <2cd4d430-54ad-4ab8-baae-b597c4a18c43@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <497e3581-bcce-4efc-b281-6b17a93479c4@mtasv.net>
References: <7ad1128e-7fdb-9976-823c-d4abdf554fa2@gmail.com>
<497e3581-bcce-4efc-b281-6b17a93479c4@mtasv.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Hi Phillip.
> The only optimization I could see is if the a.a column has NOT NULL
> defined while b.b does not have NOT NULL defined.
a.a is the primary key on table a and b.b is the foreign key on table b.
Tabela "public.a"
+--------+---------+---------------+
| Coluna | Tipo | Modificadores |
+--------+---------+---------------+
| a | integer | não nulo |
| b | integer | |
+--------+---------+---------------+
Índices:
"a_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a)
Referenciada por:
TABLE "b" CONSTRAINT "b_b_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (b) REFERENCES a(a)
Tabela "public.b"
+--------+---------+---------------+
| Coluna | Tipo | Modificadores |
+--------+---------+---------------+
| a | integer | não nulo |
| b | integer | |
+--------+---------+---------------+
Índices:
"b_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a)
Restrições de chave estrangeira:
"b_b_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (b) REFERENCES a(a)
>
> Not sure if it is all that common. Curious what if you put b.b IS NOT
> NULL in the WHERE statement?
It's the question. In the company I work with, one of my clients asked
me: "Why PostgreSQL does not remove rows with null in column b (table
b), before joining, since these rows have no corresponding in table a?"
I gave the suggestion to put the IS NOT NULL in the WHERE statement, but
HE can't modify the query in the application.
I did the tests with Oracle and it uses a predicate in the query plan,
removing the lines where b.b is null. In Oracle, it´s the same plan,
with and without IS NOT NULL in the WHERE statement.
--
Clailson Soares Dinízio de Almeida
On 19/01/2017 09:34, Phillip Couto wrote:
> NULL is still a value that may be paired with a NULL in a.a
>
> The only optimization I could see is if the a.a column has NOT NULL
> defined while b.b does not have NOT NULL defined.
>
> Not sure if it is all that common. Curious what if you put b.b IS NOT
> NULL in the WHERE statement?
>
> -----------------
> Phillip Couto
>
>
>
>> On Jan 19, 2017, at 05:08, Clailson <clailson.dba@gmail.com
>> <mailto:clailson.dba@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there something in the roadmap to optimize the inner join?
>>
>> I've this situation above. Table b has 400 rows with null in the
>> column b.
>>
>> explain analyze select * from a inner join b on (b.b = a.a);
>> "Merge Join (cost=0.55..65.30 rows=599 width=16) (actual time=0.030..1.173 rows=599 loops=1)"
>> " Merge Cond: (a.a = b.b)"
>> " -> Index Scan using a_pkey on a (cost=0.28..35.27 rows=1000 width=8) (actual time=0.014..0.364 rows=1000 loops=1)"
>> " -> Index Scan using in01 on b (cost=0.28..33.27 rows=1000 width=8) (actual time=0.012..0.249 rows=600 loops=1)"
>> "Total runtime: 1.248 ms"
>>
>> My question is: Why the planner isn't removing the null rows during
>> the scan of table b?
>> --
>> Clailson Soares Dinízio de Almeida
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: clailson.dba@gmail.com, phillip@couto.in
Subject: Re: Optimization inner join
In-Reply-To: <2cd4d430-54ad-4ab8-baae-b597c4a18c43@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox