pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Roussel <pgsql-performance@diroussel.xsmail.com>
Cc: Bill Chandler <billybobc1210@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-perform <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Index bloat problem?
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:28:32 -0400
Message-ID: <3033.1114190912@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1114186596.23462.232500712@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <20050421170018.2998.qmail@web51403.mail.yahoo.com>
	<27013.1114149431@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<869771629a1d24a91b8df779f7cddfe9@diroussel.xsmail.com>
	<329.1114178793@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1114186596.23462.232500712@webmail.messagingengine.com>

"David Roussel" <pgsql-performance@diroussel.xsmail.com> writes:
> Note there is no reference to iso_pjm_data_update_events_event_id_key
> which is the index that went wacky on us.  Does that seem weird to you?

What that says is that that index doesn't belong to that table.  You
sure it wasn't a chance coincidence of names that made you think it did?

			regards, tom lane

view thread (32+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3033.1114190912@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../3033.1114190912@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3033.1114190912@sss.pgh.pa.us

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-performance@diroussel.xsmail.com, billybobc1210@yahoo.com
  Subject: Re: Index bloat problem?
  In-Reply-To: <3033.1114190912@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox