From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
To: psql performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: filesystem options for WAL
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 00:04:31 -0500
Message-ID: <3073cc9b0807052204j14efa56ft113b50013cacddcf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
Here http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/TuningPGWAL.htm I read:
"""
Combining these two, an optimal fstab for the WAL might look like this:
/dev/hda2 /var ext3 defaults,writeback,noatime 1 2
"""
Is this info accurate?
I also read on other document from the "technical documentation" that
for partitions where you have the tables and indexes is better to have
journaling and for partitions for the WAL is better to not have
journalling...
i tought it has to be the other way (tables & indices without
journalling, WAL with journalling)
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. (593) 87171157
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec
Subject: Re: filesystem options for WAL
In-Reply-To: <3073cc9b0807052204j14efa56ft113b50013cacddcf@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox