From: Yves Vindevogel <yves.vindevogel@implements.be>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Fwd: Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:30:27 +0200
Message-ID: <30dcefefa83f93cb069019fd41427a03@implements.be> (raw)
Ok, I will hate that day, but it's only 6 months
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
> Date: Fri 17 Jun 2005 23:26:43 CEST
> To: Yves Vindevogel <yves.vindevogel@implements.be>
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster
>
>
> On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Yves Vindevogel wrote:
>
>> That means that only 2 / 5 of my discs are actual storage. That's a
>> bit low, imho.
>>
>> Maybe I can ask my question again:
>> Would I go for RAID 5, RAID 0 or PG clustering
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2005, at 22:21, Vivek Khera wrote:
> If you're allergic to RAID10, then do RAID5. but you'll sacrifice
> performance. You'll hate life the day you blow a disk and have to
> rebuild everything, even if it is all easily restored.
>
>
>
>
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,
Yves Vindevogel
Implements
Mail: yves.vindevogel@implements.be - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91
Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76
Web: http://www.implements.be
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you.
Then you win.
Mahatma Ghandi.
Attachments:Pasted Graphic 2.tiff (image/tiff, 5.6K) downloadview image
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: yves.vindevogel@implements.be
Subject: Re: Fwd: Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster
In-Reply-To: <30dcefefa83f93cb069019fd41427a03@implements.be>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox