From: Andy <angelflow@yahoo.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <312218.14775.qm@web111305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C9C21E99.2E925%scott@richrelevance.com>
--- On Wed, 4/6/11, Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com> wrote:
> I could care less about the 'fast' sandforce drives.
> They fail at a high
> rate and the performance improvement is BECAUSE they are
> using a large,
> volatile write cache.
The G1 and G2 Intel MLC also use volatile write cache, just like most SandForce drives do.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: angelflow@yahoo.com, mmoncure@gmail.com, scott@richrelevance.com, greg@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
In-Reply-To: <312218.14775.qm@web111305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox