From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: henk de wit <henk53602@hotmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: How to get parallel restore in PG 8.4 to work?
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:46:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4107.1238593597@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <COL104-W61EE9F7AF2E58BCC54F122F58B0@phx.gbl>
References: <COL104-W6288B22DCD85FC12769A2F58A0@phx.gbl>
<20300.1238540913@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<COL104-W61EE9F7AF2E58BCC54F122F58B0@phx.gbl>
henk de wit <henk53602@hotmail.com> writes:
> I still have some work to do to find out why dumping in the custom
> format is so much slower.
Offhand the only reason I can see for it to be much different from
plain-text output is that -Fc compresses by default. If you don't
care about that, try -Fc -Z0.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, henk53602@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: How to get parallel restore in PG 8.4 to work?
In-Reply-To: <4107.1238593597@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox