pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brauagustin-susc@yahoo.com.ar
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Low CPU Usage
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 06:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <425702.18731.qm@web30015.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)

Hi Greg this is my Bonnie result.

Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
insaubi          8G 25893  54 26762   9 14146   3 36846  68 43502   3 102.8   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++
insaubi,8G,25893,54,26762,9,14146,3,36846,68,43502,3,102.8,0,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++

If I compare this against my laptop (SATA disk too) is really better, but I don't know if this result is a good one or not.
I don't know where to continue looking for the cause of the problem, I think there is a bug or something missconfigured with Debian 4.0r1 and Postgres.
I unppluged the server from the network with the same results. I have the server mapped as localhost in PgAdmin III, there shouldn't be network traffic and there isn't (monitoring the network interface). I'm really lost with this weird behaviour.
I really apreciate your help
Regards
Agustin

----- Mensaje original ----
De: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Para: brauagustin-susc@yahoo.com.ar
CC: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Enviado: sábado 22 de septiembre de 2007, 3:29:17
Asunto: Re: [PERFORM] Low CPU Usage

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, brauagustin-susc@yahoo.com.ar wrote:

> Which other test can I do to find if this is a hardware, kernel o 
> postgres issue?

The little test hdparm does is not exactly a robust hard drive benchmark. 
If you want to rule out hard drive transfer speed issues, take at look at 
the tests suggested at 
http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/pg-disktesting.htm and 
see how your results compare to the single SATA disk example I give there.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD







      Las últimas noticias sobre el Mundial de Rugby 2007 están en Yahoo! Deportes. ¡Conocelas!
http://ar.sports.yahoo.com/mundialderugby

view thread (26+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <425702.18731.qm@web30015.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Permalink:  ../425702.18731.qm@web30015.mail.mud.yahoo.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/425702.18731.qm@web30015.mail.mud.yahoo.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: brauagustin-susc@yahoo.com.ar, gsmith@gregsmith.com
  Subject: Re: Low CPU Usage
  In-Reply-To: <425702.18731.qm@web30015.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox