From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Mohan, Ross <RMohan@arbinet.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA raid?
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:44:18 -0700
Message-ID: <425E9DE2.7030005@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D30625DA59@vamail01.thexchange.com>
References: <CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D30625DA59@vamail01.thexchange.com>
>
>
>Our vendor is trying to sell us on an Intel SRCS16 SATA raid controller instead of the 3ware one.
>
>
Well I have never even heard of it. 3ware is the defacto authority of
reasonable SATA RAID. If you were to
go with a different brand I would go with LSI. The LSI 150-6 is a nice
card with a battery backup option as well.
Oh and 3ware has BBU for certain models as well.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, RMohan@arbinet.com
Subject: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA raid?
In-Reply-To: <425E9DE2.7030005@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox