From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:55:10 +1000
Message-ID: <4281BA5E.9060508@samurai.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505102144.07254.josh@agliodbs.com>
References: <5F94B6EB-3925-4CD3-A67F-4310890B438A@advfn.com>
<428177E5.4030704@commandprompt.com>
<42818C7A.7020207@samurai.com>
<200505102144.07254.josh@agliodbs.com>
Josh Berkus wrote:
> The other problem, as I was told it at OSCON, was that these were not
> high-availability clusters; it's impossible to add a server to an existing
> cluster
Yeah, that's a pretty significant problem.
> a server going down is liable to take the whole cluster down.
That's news to me. Do you have more information on this?
-Neil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: neilc@samurai.com, josh@agliodbs.com, jd@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
In-Reply-To: <4281BA5E.9060508@samurai.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox