From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Steve Poe <spoe@sfnet.cc>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgresql and Software RAID/LVM
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 15:03:17 -0700
Message-ID: <42A0D3A5.1020509@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A0A549.6070501@sfnet.cc>
References: <42A0A549.6070501@sfnet.cc>
Steve Poe wrote:
> I have a small business client that cannot afford high-end/high quality
> RAID cards for their next server. That's a seperate argument/issue right
> there for me, but what the client wants is what the client wants.
>
> Has anyone ran Postgres with software RAID or LVM on a production box?
> What have been your experience?
I would not run RAID + LVM in a software scenario. Software RAID is fine
however.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> I don't forsee more 10-15 concurrent sessions running for an their OLTP
> application.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Steve Poe
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, spoe@sfnet.cc
Subject: Re: Postgresql and Software RAID/LVM
In-Reply-To: <42A0D3A5.1020509@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox