From: grupos <grupos@carvalhaes.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: PERFORMANCE ISSUE ODBC x LIBPQ C++ Application
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:32:35 -0300
Message-ID: <42BFFFF3.2080702@carvalhaes.net> (raw)
Hi !
My company is evaluating to compatibilizate our system (developed in
C++) to PostgreSQL.
Our programmer made a lot of tests and he informed me that the
performance using ODBC is very similar than using libpq, even with a big
number of simultaneous connections/queries. Of course that for us is
simpler use ODBC because will be easier to maintan as we already support
a lot of other databases using ODBC (MySQL, DB2, etc).
Someone already had this experience? What are the key benefits using
libpq insted of ODBC ?
Our application have a heavy load and around 150 concorrent users.
Regards,
Rodrigo Carvalhaes
--
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: grupos@carvalhaes.net
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE ISSUE ODBC x LIBPQ C++ Application
In-Reply-To: <42BFFFF3.2080702@carvalhaes.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox