From: Nicolas Beaume <nicolas.beaume@univ-nantes.fr>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: large table vs multiple smal tables
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:08:54 +0200
Message-ID: <42D4E836.9020607@univ-nantes.fr> (raw)
Hello
I have a large database with 4 large tables (each containing at least
200 000 rows, perhaps even 1 or 2 million) and i ask myself if it's
better to split them into small tables (e.g tables of 2000 rows) to
speed the access and the update of those tables (considering that i will
have few update but a lot of reading).
Do you think it would be efficient ?
Nicolas, wondering if he hadn't be too greedy
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
« soyez ce que vous voudriez avoir l'air d'être » Lewis Caroll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: nicolas.beaume@univ-nantes.fr
Subject: Re: large table vs multiple smal tables
In-Reply-To: <42D4E836.9020607@univ-nantes.fr>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox