From: Matthew Schumacher <matt.s@aptalaska.net>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm@alcove.com.au>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:10:07 -0800
Message-ID: <42E9BA2F.1090900@aptalaska.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0507291352460.10626@linuxworld.com.au>
References: <42E80C28.2040608@aptalaska.net>
<1122532023.25574.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
<42E9749F.6000709@aptalaska.net>
<Pine.LNX.4.58.0507291352460.10626@linuxworld.com.au>
Gavin Sherry wrote:
>
> I had a look at your data -- thanks.
>
> I have a question though: put_token() is invoked 120596 times in your
> benchmark... for 616 messages. That's nearly 200 queries (not even
> counting the 1-8 (??) inside the function itself) per message. Something
> doesn't seem right there....
>
> Gavin
I am pretty sure that's right because it is doing word statistics on
email messages.
I need to spend some time studying the code, I just haven't found time yet.
Would it be safe to say that there isn't any glaring performance
penalties other than the sheer volume of queries?
Thanks,
schu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: matt.s@aptalaska.net, swm@alcove.com.au
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
In-Reply-To: <42E9BA2F.1090900@aptalaska.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox