pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gene <genekhart@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Update INSERT RULE while running for Partitioning
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 03:51:38 -0400
Message-ID: <430d92a20607070051k514e5325q87f434ccc666c01d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

I'm using PostgreSQL 8.1.4 in a Hibernate Application and I am attempting to
use partitioning via Inherited tables. At first I was going to create a rule
per sub-table based on a date range, but found out with multiple rules
postgres will only return the affected-row count on the last rule which
gives Hibernate problems. So now I'm thinking the way to do it is just have
one rule at a time and when I want to start appending data to a new
partition, just change the rule on the parent table and also update the
constraint on the last table to reflect the date ranges contained so that
constraint_exclusion will work. this should perform better also. For
instance

Starting off with:

Parent (Rule on insert instead insert into Child2)
  Child1 (Constraint date <= somedate1)
  Child2 (Constraint date > somedate1)

Now I want to create another Partition:

 Create Table Child3
BEGIN
Update Parent Rule( instead insert into Child3)
somedate2 = max(date) from Child2
Update Child2 Constraint( date > somedate1 AND date <= somedate2 )
Set Constraint Child3 (date > somedate2)
END

Which ends up with:

Parent (Rule on insert instead insert into Child2)
  Child1 (Constraint date <= somedate1)
  Child2 (Constraint date > somedate1 AND date <= somedate2)
  Child3 (Constraint date > somedate2)

Anyone else tried this or expect it to work consistently (without stopping
db)? Is it possible that there could be a race condition for the insertion
and constraints or will the transaction prevent that from occurring? I've
done some testing and it seems to work but I could just get lucky so far and
not lose any data :)

Thanks for any help,
Gene

view thread (3+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <430d92a20607070051k514e5325q87f434ccc666c01d@mail.gmail.com>
Permalink:  ../430d92a20607070051k514e5325q87f434ccc666c01d@mail.gmail.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/430d92a20607070051k514e5325q87f434ccc666c01d@mail.gmail.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: genekhart@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Update INSERT RULE while running for Partitioning
  In-Reply-To: <430d92a20607070051k514e5325q87f434ccc666c01d@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox