From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: RAID Configuration Sugestion
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:27:37 -0700
Message-ID: <4314B329.20009@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20050830132902.021a5308@pop.earthlink.net>
References: <431452FD.3090402@atua.com.br>
<6.2.3.4.0.20050830103240.0219b640@pop.earthlink.net>
<43148FC4.4000407@commandprompt.com>
<6.2.3.4.0.20050830132902.021a5308@pop.earthlink.net>
>
>> If you still have the budget, I would suggest considering either what
>> Ron suggested or possibly using a 4 drive RAID 10 instead.
>
>
> IME, with only 4 HDs, it's usually better to split them them into two
> RAID 1's (one for the db, one for everything else including the logs)
> than it is to put everything on one RAID 10. YMMV.
Really? That's interesting. My experience is different, I assume SCSI?
Software/Hardware Raid?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Ron Peacetree
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, rjpeace@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: RAID Configuration Sugestion
In-Reply-To: <4314B329.20009@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox