From: Joe <svn@freedomcircle.net>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Comparative performance
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:00:04 -0400
Message-ID: <433B4AA4.9080008@freedomcircle.net> (raw)
I'm converting a relatively small database (2 MB) from MySQL to PostgreSQL. It
is used to generate web pages using PHP. Although the actual website runs under
Linux, the development is done under XP. I've completed most of the data
conversion and rewrite of the PHP scripts, so now I'm comparing relative
performance.
It appears that PostgreSQL is two to three times slower than MySQL. For
example, some pages that have some 30,000 characters (when saved as HTML) take 1
to 1 1/2 seconds with MySQL but 3 to 4 seconds with PostgreSQL. I had read that
the former was generally faster than the latter, particularly for simple web
applications but I was hoping that Postgres' performance would not be that
noticeably slower.
I'm trying to determine if the difference can be attributed to anything that
I've done or missed. I've run VACUUM ANALYZE on the two main tables and I'm
looking at the results of EXPLAIN on the query that drives the retrieval of
probably 80% of the data for the pages in question.
Before I post the EXPLAIN and the table schema I'd appreciate confirmation that
this list is the appropriate forum. I'm a relative newcomer to PostgreSQL (but
not to relational databases), so I'm not sure if this belongs in the novice or
general lists.
Joe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: svn@freedomcircle.net
Subject: Re: Comparative performance
In-Reply-To: <433B4AA4.9080008@freedomcircle.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox