From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 11:19:26 -0400
Message-ID: <433EA8FE.8050103@dunslane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25552174.1128176560482.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <25552174.1128176560482.JavaMail.root@elwamui-polski.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Ron Peacetree wrote:
>The good news is all this means it's easy to demonstrate that we can
>improve the performance of our sorting functionality.
>
>Assuming we get the abyssmal physical IO performance fixed...
>(because until we do, _nothing_ is going to help us as much)
>
>
>
I for one would be paying more attention if such a demonstration were
forthcoming, in the form of a viable patch and some benchmark results.
cheers
andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew@dunslane.net, rjpeace@earthlink.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort?
In-Reply-To: <433EA8FE.8050103@dunslane.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox