pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leigh Dyer <lsd@linuxgamers.net>
To: Postgres-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Help speeding up delete
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:18:48 +1100
Message-ID: <43793778.7040006@linuxgamers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43792523.5090003@noao.edu>
References: <43790A99.9050603@noao.edu>
	<4162.1132011763@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<43792523.5090003@noao.edu>

Steve Wampler wrote:
> 
> Is the performance behavior that we're experiencing a known
> problem with 7.2 that has been addressed in 7.4?  Or will the
> upgrade fix other problems while leaving this one?

I'm pretty sure that in versions earlier than 7.4, IN clauses that use a 
subquery will always use a seqscan, regardless of what indexes are 
available. If you try an IN using explicit values though, it should use 
the index.

Thanks
Leigh



view thread (28+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <43793778.7040006@linuxgamers.net>
Permalink:  ../43793778.7040006@linuxgamers.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/43793778.7040006@linuxgamers.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: lsd@linuxgamers.net
  Subject: Re: Help speeding up delete
  In-Reply-To: <43793778.7040006@linuxgamers.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox