pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <LLonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: Adam Weisberg <Aweisberg@seiu1199.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 05:58:48 -0800
Message-ID: <437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33c6269f0511152115v1a34ab81j30f1f5df5a6c6956@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D01995F7B@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com>
	<33c6269f0511152115v1a34ab81j30f1f5df5a6c6956@mail.gmail.com>


>> I agree - you can get a very good one from www.acmemicro.com or
>> www.rackable.com with 8x 400GB SATA disks and the new 3Ware 9550SX SATA
>> RAID controller for about $6K with two Opteron 272 CPUs and 8GB of RAM
>> on a Tyan 2882 motherboard.  We get about 400MB/s sustained disk read
>> performance on these (with tuning) on Linux using the xfs filesystem,
>> which is one of the most critical factors for large databases.
>>
>>     
>
> Spend a fortune on dual core CPUs and then buy crappy disks...  I bet
> for most applications this system will be IO bound, and you will see a
> nice lot of drive failures in the first year of operation with
> consumer grade drives.
>   
There is nothing wrong with using SATA disks and they perform very well. 
The catch is, make sure
you have a battery back up on the raid controller.

> Spend your money on better Disks, and don't bother with Dual Core IMHO
> unless you can prove the need for it.
>   
The reason you want the dual core cpus is that PostgreSQL can only 
execute 1 query per cpu
at a time, so the application will see a big boost in overall 
transactional velocity if you push two
dual-core cpus into the machine.


Joshua D. Drake


> Alex
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>   




view thread (173+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com>
Permalink:  ../437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, armtuk@gmail.com, LLonergan@greenplum.com, Aweisberg@seiu1199.org
  Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
  In-Reply-To: <437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox