From: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: stange@rentec.com
Cc: gsstark@mit.edu
Cc: pg@fastcrypt.com
Cc: icub3d@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:55:59 +1300
Message-ID: <43803A1F.9030708@paradise.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <437F9919.20305@paradise.net.nz>
References: <BFA3ABF0.14124%llonergan@greenplum.com>
<437F9919.20305@paradise.net.nz>
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
> - I am happy that seqscan is cpu bound after ~110M/s (It's cpu bound on
> my old P3 system even earlier than that....)
Ahem - after reading Alan's postings I am not so sure, ISTM that there
is some more investigation required here too :-).
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: markir@paradise.net.nz, llonergan@greenplum.com, stange@rentec.com, gsstark@mit.edu, pg@fastcrypt.com, icub3d@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
In-Reply-To: <43803A1F.9030708@paradise.net.nz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox