From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
To: Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index behaviour)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:52:46 +0800
Message-ID: <43F3DAEE.30002@familyhealth.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F3BF72.6000202@gpdnet.co.uk>
References: <43F38867.6010701@gpdnet.co.uk>
<19510.1140036968@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<19779.1140038874@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<43F39E53.1020009@gpdnet.co.uk>
<20781.1140046109@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<43F3BF72.6000202@gpdnet.co.uk>
> Ouch! That confirms my problem. I generated the random test case because
> it was easier than including the dump of my tables, but you can
> appreciate that tables 20 times the size are basically crippled when it
> comes to creating an index on them.
I have to say that I restored a few gigabyte dump on freebsd the other
day, and most of the restore time was in index creation - I didn't think
too much of it though at the time. FreeBSD 4.x.
Chris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: chriskl@familyhealth.com.au, gpd@gpdnet.co.uk, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index behaviour)
In-Reply-To: <43F3DAEE.30002@familyhealth.com.au>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox