pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Craig A. James <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:12:43 -0800
Message-ID: <43FF92EB.7060704@modgraph-usa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FF403D.8090305@commandprompt.com>
References: <200602241429.k1OETwD07991@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<43FF2095.6050505@modgraph-usa.com>
	<43FF403D.8090305@commandprompt.com>

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> I find this strains credibility, that this major manufacturer of PC's 
>> would do something deceptive that hurts performance, when it would be 
>> easily detected and widely reported.  Can anyone cite a specific 
>> instances where this has happened?  Such as, "I bought Dell model XYZ, 
>> which was advertised to have these parts and these specs, but in fact 
>> had these other parts and here are the actual specs."
> 
> I can :)
> 
> Feb 20 07:33:52 master kernel: [4294682.803000]   Vendor: MegaRAID  
> Model: LD 0 RAID1   51G  Rev: 196T
> --- snip ---
> This machine... if you run it in raid 5 will only get 7-9 megabytes a 
> second READ! performance. That is with 6 SCSI drives.
> If you run it in RAID 10 you get a more reasonable 50-55 megabytes per 
> second.

But you don't say how this machine was advertised.  Are there components in that list that were not as advertised?  Was the machine advertised as capable of RAID 5?  Were performance figures published for RAID 5?

If Dell advertised that the machine could do what you asked, then you're right -- they screwed you.  But if it was designed for and advertised to a different market, then I've made my point: People are blaming Dell for something that's not their fault.

Craig



view thread (33+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <43FF92EB.7060704@modgraph-usa.com>
Permalink:  ../43FF92EB.7060704@modgraph-usa.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/43FF92EB.7060704@modgraph-usa.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: cjames@modgraph-usa.com, jd@commandprompt.com
  Subject: Re: Reliability recommendations
  In-Reply-To: <43FF92EB.7060704@modgraph-usa.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox